SHEMO v. MAYFIELD HTS.

No. 98-2054.

88 Ohio St.3d 7 (2000)

SHEMO ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. MAYFIELD HEIGHTS ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 9, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kahn, Kleinman, Yanowitz & Arnson Co., L.P.A., Sheldon Berns and Benjamin J. Ockner, Chester, Willcox & Saxbe, L.L.P., and J. Craig Wright; Forbes, Forbes & Associates and George L. Forbes, for appellants.

The Carr Law Firm, L. Bryan Carr and Leonard F. Carr, for appellees.


FRANCIS E. SWEENEY, SR., J.

In this case, we are asked to decide whether Mayfield Heights' U-2-A zoning classification of the property is unconstitutional. Initially, we must decide whether the court of appeals was correct in remanding the case for reconsideration under the Goldberg decision. For the reasons that follow, we find that remand to the trial court was unnecessary. Since there was competent, credible evidence supporting the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases