AMADOU v. I.N.S.

No. 99-3824.

226 F.3d 724 (2000)

Mamadou AMADOU, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: September 12, 2000


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bryan Scott Hicks (argued and briefed), Cincinnati, Ohio, for Petitioner.

Joan E. Smiley (argued and briefed), Karen Fletcher Torstenson (briefed), U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before: JONES, BOGGS, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Mamadou Amadou challenges the Board of Immigration Appeals' denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of deportation, and voluntary departure. In denying Amadou's applications, the Board upheld the ruling of the immigration judge, who found Amadou not credible because of his alleged inconsistent testimony, dispassionate demeanor, and failure to establish...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases