1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 215 F.3d
  5. 215 F.3d 723 (2000)
 

KIMBRO v. PEPSICO, INC.

No. 99-2823.

215 F.3d 723 (2000)

Lonnie KIMBRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PEPSICO, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided June 2, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrea L. Wirth (argued), Swansea, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Gregg M. Lemley (argued), Bryan Cave, St. Louis, MO, for Defendants-Appellees Pepsico, Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc., Mark Ansell, and Maureen Russell.

Robert W. Stewart (argued), McMahon, Berger, Hanna, Linihan, Cody & McCarthy, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant-Appellee Supervalu Inc.

Before POSNER, Chief Judge, and EASTERBROOK and DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judges.

POSNER, Chief Judge.

Lonnie Kimbro sued his former employer, Frito-Lay, for having violated the federal age discrimination law by firing him, allegedly on account of his being over 40. He joined with this claim a supplemental claim under state law against two of his supervisors at Frito-Lay, plus Super Valu, Inc., doing business under the name of Shop 'N Save, and a Shop 'N Save store manager named Ansell, for tortious interference with his employment contract with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases