The IAS Court correctly determined that the charging lien held by defendants Sopwith's,Trisha's and Hungarian's attorneys attributable to their successful prosecution of those defendants' conversion claims against plaintiff bank is superior to the bank's right to reduce the amount awarded those defendants on such claims by the amount of any attorneys' fees the bank recovers against those defendants for having successfully resisted their claims of unauthorized trading (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
INDOSUEZ v. SOPWITH HOLDINGS CORP.
275 A.D.2d 662 (2000)
713 N.Y.S.2d 179
BANQUE INDOSUEZ, Appellant, v. SOPWITH HOLDINGS CORP. et al., Respondents. SOPWITH HOLDINGS CORP. et al., Appellants, v. BANQUE INDOSUEZ et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided September 26, 2000.
Decided September 26, 2000.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
