PUBLICIS COMMUNICATION v. TRUE NORTH COMMUNS.

Nos. 99-1199, 99-3424.

206 F.3d 725 (2000)

PUBLICIS COMMUNICATION, Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant, and Publicis S.A., a French corporation, Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant, v. TRUE NORTH COMMUNICATIONS INC., Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided March 14, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen J. Bisgeiger, Miller, Shakman, Hamilton, Kurtzon & Schlifke, Chicago, IL, Linda C. Goldstein (argued), Covington & Burling, New York, NY, for Publicis Communication and Publicis S.A.

Walter C. Carlson (argued), Sidley & Austin, Chicago, IL, for True North Communications, Inc.

Before BAUER, FLAUM, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.


TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge.

Arbitration can be an effective way to resolve a dispute in less time, at less expense, and with less rancor than litigating in the courts. Arbitration loses some of its luster, though, when one party refuses to abide by the outcome and the courts are called in after all for enforcement. This is one of those situations.

A joint venture between two advertising companies, Chicago-based True North Communications Inc. and Paris...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases