1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 29 S.W.3d
  5. 29 S.W.3d 896 (2000)
 

PAYTON v. ASHTON

No. 07-99-0490-CV.

29 S.W.3d 896 (2000)

Mary Ellen PAYTON, Appellant, v. John ASHTON, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo.

August 24, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bob Blinderman, Amarillo, for appellant.

John Ashton, Amarillo, pro se.

Before BOYD, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

BRIAN QUINN, Justice.

Appealing from a take nothing judgment entered in favor of John Ashton (Ashton), Mary Ellen Payton (Payton) asserts two points of error. Through the first she alleges that the trial court "erred in denying Appellant's claims in the Final Judgment" and, in the second, that it "erred in denying Appellant a new trial." From the body of Payton's brief, we gather that she believed the trial court erred in both respects because it failed to deem admitted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases