1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 10 P.3d
  5. 10 P.3d 906 (2000)
 

IN RE BRANDT/GRIFFIN

(OSB 95-6; SC S45122, S45123)

10 P.3d 906 (2000)

331 Or. 113

In re Complaint as to the CONDUCT OF William D. BRANDT, Accused. In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Mark E. Griffin, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided September 14, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter R. Jarvis, Stoel Rives LLP, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for the accused, William D. Brandt.

W. Eugene Hallman, Pendleton, argued the cause and filed the briefs for the accused, Mark E. Griffin.

Mary A. Cooper, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, Lake Oswego, argued the cause and filed the brief for the Oregon State Bar. With her on the brief was Jeffrey Sapiro.

Before CARSON, Chief Justice, and GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, KULONGOSKI, LEESON, and RIGGS, Justices.

PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated lawyer discipline proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged William D. Brandt and Mark E. Griffin (collectively, "the accused") with violating four disciplinary rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility: Disciplinary Rule (DR) 5-101(A)(1) (prohibiting accepting or continuing employment when exercise of lawyer's judgment will be or reasonably may be affected by lawyer's own interest, except with consent of client after full...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases