OPINION
HARTEN, Judge
The district court denied appellant's motion for summary judgment and purported to certify a question as important and doubtful pursuant to Minn. R. Civ.App. P. 103.03(h). Because the district court did not specify the precise legal question being certified, we dismiss the appeal.
FACTS
Between August 27, 1995, and September 26, 1995, appellant Gregg N. Dyste, M.D., treated respondent Peter W. Morton for a spinal cord...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.