1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 16 S.W.3d
  5. 16 S.W.3d 893 (2000)
 

BRIDAS CORP. v. UNOCAL CORP.

No. 14-99-00196-CV.

16 S.W.3d 893 (2000)

BRIDAS CORPORATION, Appellant, v. UNOCAL CORPORATION, Delta Oil Corporation Ltd., Delta International, and Deltoil Corporation, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.).

April 27, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patricia A. Hill, Murray Fogler, George P. Hardy, III, William P. Maines, Paula K. Hutchinson, Houston, Susan Lea Hays, Dallas, Michael E. Orsak, Thomas R. McDade, Houston, for appellant.

Randall W. Wilson, William W. Ogden, Phillip T. Bruns, Jeffrey C. Alexander, Houston, for appellees.

Panel consists of Chief Justice MURPHY, Justices HUDSON, and WITTIG.

OPINION

DON WITTIG, Justice.

The principle issue presented is choice of law. The trial court found that Turkmenistan and Afghanistan law applied to the tortious interference claims. Based upon the application of those foreign laws, the trial court also granted summary judgment because no such interference claims exist in situs of the alleged injuries. We affirm.

Bridas Corporation ("Bridas") appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of Unocal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases