RUBIN v. SCHOTTENSTEIN, ZOX & DUNN

No. C-2-93-325.

119 F.Supp.2d 787 (2000)

Robert E. RUBIN, Plaintiff, v. SCHOTTENSTEIN, ZOX & DUNN, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

October 27, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Hayes Rion, John H Rion and Associates, Dayton, OH, Bernard Duncan Mazer, Bernard D. Mazer & Associates, Dublin, OH, Robert S Wolf, Gersten Savage & Kaplowitz, New York, NY, for plaintiff.

Robert Ward Trafford, Porter Wright Morris & Arthur, Columbus, OH, Joseph William Ryan, Jr., Porter Wright Morris & Arthur, Columbus, OH, for defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge.

Plaintiff asserts securities fraud and common law fraud in connection with a loan he extended to a company that developed the "TENS" unit biotherapy system. Defendant moves for summary judgment (Doc. 102). For the reasons that follow the Court grants defendants' motion.

I.

The remaining plaintiff, Robert M. Rubin, is, in his own words, a sophisticated investor. Defendant Richard...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases