Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the trial court did not err in reversing an evidentiary ruling mid-trial. The document which was the subject of the ruling, offered as a business record, contained conclusions as to the cause of the accident which were not made by an expert, and which did not stem from post-incident expert analysis of observable physical evidence (see, Valloney v Viau,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.