CITY OF SACO v. PULSIFER


749 A.2d 153 (2000)

2000 ME 74

CITY OF SACO v. John M. PULSIFER.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided April 26, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel L. Cummings (orally), Norman, Hanson & DeTroy, LLC, Portland, for plaintiff.

Michael J. Gartland (orally), George J. Marcus, Marcus, Grygiel & Clegg, P.A., Portland, for defendant.

Before WATHEN, C.J., and CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA, SAUFLEY, ALEXANDER, and CALKINS, JJ.


SAUFLEY, J.

[¶ 1] The City of Saco appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court (York County, Fritzsche, J.) dismissing the City's suit against John Pulsifer because it is barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm the judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2] The facts that give rise to the City's claim are not in dispute. Pulsifer owns property within the City of Saco. In 1990, the City assessed $9,547.62 in property taxes on Pulsifer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases