UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
v.
James ELKINS, Carol Elkins, et al., Defendants.
United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 6, 2000.
March 6, 2000.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
James R. Garts, Jr., Harris, Shelton, Dunlap & Cobb, Memphis, TN, William D. Massey, Massey & McClusky, Memphis, TN, Michael J. Stengel, Stengel Law Firm, Memphis, TN, Paul D. Petruzzi, Black, Srebnick & Kornspan, P.A., Miami, FL, E.E. Edwards, III, Edwards & Simmons, Nashville, TN, for James Elkins.
A.C. Wharton, Jr., Wharton & Wharton, Memphis, TN, William D. Massey, Lorna S. McClusky, Memphis, TN, E.E. Edwards, Edwards & Simmons, Nashville, TN, Gerald F. Easter, Law Office of Gerald Easter, Memphis, TN, for Carol Elkins.
Carol Elkins, Memphis, TN, pro se.
Robert C. Irby, Law Office of Robert C. Irby, Memphis, TN, Sheila D. Brown, Law Office of Sheila D. Brown, for Jesus Morales.
Eugene A. Laurenzi, Agee, Allen, Godwin, Morris, Laurenzi & Hamilton, Memphis, TN, Robert C. Brooks, Law Office of Robert C. Brooks, Memphis, TN, for Raul Sandoval.
William C. Anderson, Jr., Anderson Law Firm, Memphis, TN, for Victor Saucedo.
T. Clifton Harviel, Jr., Federal Public Defender's Office, Memphis, TN, for Miguel Infante.
Lawrence W. Kern, Kern Law Firm, Memphis, TN, for Jose Infante.
Robert Miles Mason, Crone & Mason, PLC, Memphis, TN, for Juan Saucedo.
Matthew J. McDonald, Law Office of Mattew J. McDonald, Memphis, TN, for Artudo Infante.
Kathleen L. Caldwell, Taylor, Halliburton, Ledbetter & Caldwell, Memphis, TN, for Ricardo Sandoval, Jr.
Howard Brett Manis, Law Office of Howard Manis, Memphis, TN, for Roberto Sandoval.
Christopher E. Cotten, U.S. Atty's Office, Memphis, TN, for U.S.
United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division.
MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS
DONALD, District Judge.
Before the court are the motions of the defendants, James Elkins and Carol Elkins, to suppress evidence gained from searches of their various properties, which were conducted both without and pursuant to warrants.1 The United States opposes the motions. Evidentiary hearings were conducted August 30-31, September...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
