WOLFKILL FEED & FERTILIZER CORP. v. MARTIN

No. 18937-6-III.

14 P.3d 877 (2000)

103 Wash.App. 836

WOLFKILL FEED AND FERTILIZER CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, Respondent, v. James MARTIN and Jane Doe Martin, husband and wife; CTM, Inc., a Washington corporation, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Three.

December 26, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Reynolds, Yakima, for Appellants.

Nicholas L. Wallace, Schultheis & Tabler, Ephrata, for Respondent.


SWEENEY, J.

Mandatory arbitration rules prohibit any reference to the arbitration in any pleading, brief, or other written or oral statement to the court on trial de novo. MAR 7.2(b)(1). Wolfkill Feed and Fertilizer Corporation violated this rule when it discussed the factual substance of the case and that the claim was for $9,000 in its memorandum on de novo review. The question before us is whether the trial judge abused his discretion by refusing to recuse himself...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases