STATE v. PIERCE


750 A.2d 139 (2000)

330 N.J. Super. 479

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Carl B. PIERCE, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 4, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wayne Powell, Cherry Hill, for defendant-appellant (Roderick Taylor Baltimore, on the brief).

Steven A. Yomtov, Deputy Attorney General, for plaintiff-respondent (John J. Farmer, Jr., Attorney General, attorney for plaintiff-respondent; Mr. Yomtov, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges HAVEY, KEEFE and COLLESTER.


The opinion of the court was delivered by COLLESTER, J.A.D.

In this appeal we are constrained to reverse the defendant's conviction and remand for a new trial because of the inadequacy of the jury instruction as to identification and the improper and prejudicial comments in the prosecutor's summation regarding the post-arrest silence of the defendant.

Tried to a jury on Cumberland County Indictment No. 97-06-00582...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases