NIEHOFF v. SHANKMAN & ASSOCS. LEGAL CTR.


763 A.2d 121 (2000)

2000 ME 214

Michael NIEHOFF v. SHANKMAN & ASSOCIATES LEGAL CENTER, P.A.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided December 21, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis M. Jackson (orally), Jackson & MacNichol, Portland, for plaintiff.

Wendell G. Large (orally), Anne H. Cressey, Richardson Whitman Large & Badger, P.C., Portland, for defendant.

Panel: WATHEN, C.J., and CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA, ALEXANDER, and CALKINS, JJ.


ALEXANDER, J.

[¶ 1] Michael Niehoff appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Delahanty, J.) denying his motion for partial summary judgment and granting Shankman & Associates Legal Center's motion for summary judgment as to all claims. Niehoff contends that the court erred in: (1) ruling that Niehoff would not have been entitled to severance benefits if L.L. Bean, Inc.'s severance pay policy was considered to be a welfare plan...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases