Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the People's fire investigation expert improperly testified as to the cause of the fire at the complainant's home, thereby leading the jury to the conclusion that the fire was set intentionally. Since the defendant failed to object to this testimony at trial, the claim has not been preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the expert did not testify that the fire was...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
