1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 29 S.W.3d
  5. 29 S.W.3d 843 (2000)
 

WOODARD v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM/QUEST

No. ED 77685.

29 S.W.3d 843 (2000)

Owen K. WOODARD, Claimant/Appellant, v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM/QUEST, Employer/Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

October 24, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Owen K. Woodard, St. Louis, pro se.

Smithkline Beecham, St. Louis, pro se.

Alan J. Downs, St. Louis, for respondent Missouri Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, Division of Employment Security.

Before MARY K. HOFF, C.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Sr.J.

PER CURIAM.

Claimant, Owen K. Woodard, appeals from an order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the decision of the Appeals Tribunal. We dismiss the appeal for substantial failure to comply with Rule 84.04.

Claimant appeals to this court pro se. Pro se appellants are held to the same standards as attorneys and must comply with Supreme Court rules, including Rule 84.04, which sets out the requirements for appellate briefs. Coyne v...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases