Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
In 1998 the plaintiff commenced this action, inter alia, to recover money which he paid to the defendants as a retainer in 1988 and 1989. The Supreme Court properly dismissed the action as time-barred since it was commenced more than six years after the cessation of the attorney-client relationship between the plaintiff and the defendants (see, CPLR 213; Goicoechea v Law Offs. of Stephen R. Kihl,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.