1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 223 F.3d
  5. 223 F.3d 648 (2000)
 

GRUMHAUS v. COMERICA SECURITIES, INC.

No. 99-4238.

223 F.3d 648 (2000)

Andrew S. GRUMHAUS and Leslie Grumhaus-Davidson, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. COMERICA SECURITIES, INC., as successor-in-interest to Comerica Financial Services Inc., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided August 3, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan W. Young (argued), Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

James C. Schroeder (argued), Douglas A. Albritton, Mayer, Brown & Platt, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before POSNER, COFFEY and KANNE, Circuit Judges.

KANNE, Circuit Judge.

A year after Andrew S. Grumhaus and Leslie Grumhaus Davidson ("the Grumhaus children") sued Comerica Securities in state court and nearly six months after the case was dismissed, they demanded a chance to arbitrate the dispute. Comerica resisted arbitration on the ground that the contractual right to arbitrate had been waived. The Grumhaus children moved to compel arbitration, and the district court ruled that the Grumhaus children had not waived...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases