COMMERCE BANK, N.A. v. RICKETT


748 A.2d 111 (2000)

329 N.J. Super. 379

COMMERCE BANK, N.A., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Bruce RICKETT, Individually and t/a Rick's Auto Sales, Defendant, and DeSimone Auto, Inc., t/a Executive Auto Sales, j/s/a, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 31, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rex J. Roldan, Woodbury, for defendant-appellant (Albertson Ward, attorneys; Mr. Roldan, on the brief).

Richard M. Berman, Cherry Hill, for plaintiff-respondent (Parker, McCay & Criscuolo, attorneys; Mr. Berman, on the brief).

Before Judges SKILLMAN, NEWMAN and FALL.


The opinion of the court was delivered by NEWMAN, J.A.D.

This appeal questions whether a bank can be a holder in due course when it makes payment on a check, dated a year before it was presented, which, in fact, was presented within ninety days after the date of its actual issuance. We hold that, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 12A:3-304a(2), a check becomes "overdue" ninety days after the date it is actually issued and, thus...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases