Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The petitioner contends that the termination of his employment without a hearing violated Civil Service Law § 75 (1) (a) because, before his employment was terminated, he had been promoted to the position of custodian, a "position by permanent appointment in the competitive class of the classified civil service" (Civil Service Law § 75 [1] [a]). However, the unrebutted evidence in the record reveals that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.