The defendants' demand for a change of venue, predicated on the ground that the designated county was improper (see, CPLR 510 [1]), was not served with the answer or before the answer was served (see, CPLR 511 [a]), but was made over two years later and was therefore addressed to the court's discretion (see, Horowicz v RSD Transp.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.