MAURO v. GAROFALO, JR.


271 A.D.2d 581 (2000)

707 N.Y.S.2d 342

CAMILLE A. MAURO et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. NICOLO A. GAROFALO, JR., Appellant-Respondent, and ANNA IMPERIALE, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided April 17, 2000.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

As there is "`no valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences which could possibly lead rational men to the conclusion reached by the jury on the basis of the evidence presented at trial,'" the trial court properly set aside the verdict, and awarded judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant Nicolo A. Garofalo, Jr., only, dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases