1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 761 A.2d
  5. 761 A.2d 90 (2000)
 

SPARWICK CONTRACTING, INC. v. TOMASCO CORP.

761 A.2d 90 (2000)

335 N.J. Super. 73

SPARWICK CONTRACTING, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TOMASCO CORPORATION, Defendant-Respondent, and Carl Walker Construction Group, Inc., Defendant-Appellant, and LeFrak Organization, Inc., Defendant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 8, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harvey, Pennington, Cabot, Griffith & Renneisen, Cherry Hill, attorneys, for appellant (Gary C. Chiumento, on the brief).

Gerald P. Scala, West Orange, attorney, for respondent Tomasco Corporation.

Tesser & Cohen, Hackensack, attorneys, for respondent Sparwick Contracting, Inc. (Lee M. Tesser, on the brief).

No brief was filed by any other party.

Before Judges PRESSLER, KESTIN and CIANCIA.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KESTIN, J.A.D.

Defendant Carl Walker Construction Group, Inc. (Walker), a Michigan corporation with headquarters in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, appeals on leave granted from the provision of the trial court's interlocutory order of May 15, 2000, which directed a consolidated arbitration to proceed in the State of New Jersey; and from the trial court's declination to award sanctions in the form of counsel fees pursuant to

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases