1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 748 A.2d
  5. 748 A.2d 103 (2000)
 

IN RE WRIGHT

748 A.2d 103 (2000)

163 N.J. 133

In the Matter of William WRIGHT, Jr., An Attorney at Law.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 17, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John McGill, III, Deputy Ethics Counsel, on behalf of the Office of Attorney Ethics.

Raymond A. Brown, Jr., Newark, for respondent (Brown and Brown and Alan Dexter Bowman, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

This matter arises from a decision of the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) recommending that respondent William Wright, Jr. be disbarred. The matter came before the DRB on presentment of a Special Master charging respondent with knowing misappropriation of client funds, an event that almost invariably results in disbarment under the rule of In re Wilson, 81 N.J. 451, 409 A.2d 1153...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases