HARMAN v. HEARTLAND FOOD CO.

No. C5-99-1805.

614 N.W.2d 236 (2000)

Mark HARMAN, Respondent, v. HEARTLAND FOOD COMPANY, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

July 18, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Brian O'Leary, O'Leary and Moritz, Chartered, Springfield, for respondent.

James H. Malecki, Mark S. Ullery, Gislason & Hunter, L.L.P., Mankato, for appellants.

Considered and decided by DAVIES, Presiding Judge, PETERSON, Judge, and HALBROOKS, Judge.


OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

After a jury trial, appellants Heartland Food Company and Tim Johnson were found liable on respondent Mark Harman's claims for defamation and wrongful interference with a contractual relationship. They challenge the trial court's denial of their motion for JNOV. Appellants argue that (1) Johnson's statement about Harman's skills was non-actionable and (2) any interference with Harman's employment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases