PEKER v. KAPLAN


268 A.D.2d 572 (2000)

702 N.Y.S.2d 852

ELYA PEKER, Appellant, v. ARTHUR A. KAPLAN et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided January 31, 2000.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A party moving pursuant to CPLR 3404 to restore a case to the trial calendar must demonstrate that the case has merit, there is a reasonable excuse for the delay, there was no intent to abandon the matter, and there is no prejudice to the nonmoving party (see, Moses v Wilmaud Realty Corp., 262 A.D.2d 538; Yacono v Waterman S.S. Co., 216 A.D.2d 556

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases