SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. COMMISSIONER

Docket No. 15086-98.

80 T.C.M. 759 (2000)

T.C. Memo. 2000-361

Seagate Technology, Inc., Successor In Interest To Seagate Peripherals, Inc., f/k/a Conner Peripherals, Inc. v. Commissioner.

United States Tax Court.

Filed November 27, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark A. Oates, Thomas V.M. Linguanti, John M. Peterson, Jr., Mary E. Wynne, and Andrew P. Crousore, for the petitioner. Debra K. Estrem, Michael J. Cooper, Bryce A. Kranzthor, Jeffrey L. Heinkel, Lavonne D. Lawson, Ewan D. Purkiss, and Mark S. Heroux, for the respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

GERBER, Judge:

Pursuant to Rule 121,1 this matter is before the Court on the parties' cross-motions for partial summary judgment.2 The parties seek to determine, as a matter of law, whether the "relation-back doctrine" established in Arrowsmith v. Commissioner [52-2 USTC ¶ 9527], 344 U.S. 6 (1952), applies in characterizing petitioner...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases