Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record does not support his claim that a deliberating juror concealed his place of employment during voir dire. Rather, no one asked the then-prospective juror during voir dire where he worked. The court therefore properly determined that the juror was not grossly unqualified (see, CPL 270.35; People v Owens,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS
272 A.D.2d 563 (2000)
708 N.Y.S.2d 888
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ISHMEL WILLIAMS, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 22, 2000.
Decided May 22, 2000.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
