RADUE v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.

No. 00-1003.

219 F.3d 612 (2000)

William RADUE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided July 10, 2000


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce M. Davey (argued), Lawton & Cates, Madison, WI, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Bernard J. Bobber (argued), Foley & Lardner, Milwaukee, WI, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before BAUER, EASTERBROOK, and MANION, Circuit Judges.


MANION, Circuit Judge.

When Kimberly-Clark informed William Radue that he would be laid off from his mechanical engineer position as part of a reduction in force, it also mentioned that he could seek other positions with the company. Radue never secured another job, so he sued under the ADEA, maintaining that younger employees were given positions for which he was qualified. Because Radue failed to show discrimination under the direct method, and was unable to establish...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases