FAIRCLOTH v. RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. 21359.

620 N.W.2d 198 (2000)

2000 SD 158

Gretchen L. FAIRCLOTH, Claimant and Appellee, v. RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC., Self-Insurer, Employer and Appellant.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Decided December 20, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip R. Parent of Arneson, Issenhuth & Gienapp, Madison, SD, Attorneys for claimant and appellee.

Paul T. Barnett of Siegel, Barnett & Schutz, Sioux Falls, SD, Attorneys for self-insurer, employer and appellant.


KONENKAMP, Justice

[¶ 1.] In this workers' compensation appeal, we must decide which of two statutes of limitations applies to a claim. The employer contends that the two-year limitation in SDCL 62-7-35 pertains because the employer gave written notice denying the claim. The employee, on the other hand, contends that the three-year period in SDCL 62-7-35.1 applies because the employer previously provided benefits to the employee. The Department of Labor ruled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases