CLARK-HUBER v. LEO


268 A.D.2d 550 (2000)

702 N.Y.S.2d 835

MARI CLARK-HUBER, Appellant, v. KATHLEEN LEO, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided January 31, 2000.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff was bitten by a dog on premises owned by the defendant and the defendant's in-laws. The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages under a theory of strict liability. The record is devoid of evidence that the defendant was aware that the dog had vicious propensities or that the dog had displayed such propensities in the past (see, Strunk v Zoltanski, 62 N.Y.2d 572

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases