1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 94 N.Y.2d
  5. 94 N.Y.2d 719 (2000)
 

MTR. OF ARBITRATION BETWEEN BARNES & COUNCIL 82

94 N.Y.2d 719 (2000)

731 N.E.2d 134

709 N.Y.S.2d 478

In the Matter of the Arbitration between WILLIAM W. BARNES, as Sheriff of Schenectady County, Respondent, and COUNCIL 82, AFSCME, on Behalf of DAVID MONROE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided May 9, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hite & Casey, P. C., Albany (Michael G. Weisberg of counsel), for appellant.

Gordon, Siegel, Mastro, Mullaney, Gordon & Galvin, P. C., Latham (Jeffrey T. Culkin of counsel), for respondent.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK and WESLEY concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROSENBLATT, J.

After having paid a correction employee disability benefits for a three-year period, the Schenectady County Sheriff's Department directed him to report for light duty pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-c (3). Resisting the directive, the employee filed a demand to arbitrate. The question before us is whether the employee can compel arbitration. For the reasons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases