1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 14 P.3d
  5. 14 P.3d 66 (2000)
 

IN RE BENETT

(OSB 96-90, 96-184; SC S34639).

14 P.3d 66 (2000)

331 Or. 270

In re Complaint as to the CONDUCT OF Edward J. BENETT, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc.

Decided November 9, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward J. Benett, pro se, argued the cause and filed the briefs.

Mary A. Cooper, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, Lake Oswego, argued the cause and filed the briefs for the Oregon State Bar.

PER CURIAM.

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, a trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found that the accused violated Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(3) (prohibiting conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation) while representing his client Moore and violated DR 2-106(A) (prohibiting excessive fees) and DR 9-101(C)(4) (requiring prompt return of client property) in dealing with his clients Chesney. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases