Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
There was sufficient evidence that the defendant was involved in a conspiracy to sell drugs to justify the introduction of background testimony by a police officer regarding so-called "buy and bust" operations in general, and to explain the absence of prerecorded buy money and drugs on the defendant's person at the time of his arrest (see, People v Brown,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.