WESTERDALE v. GROSSMAN

No. 3-99-0619.

728 N.E.2d 67 (2000)

312 Ill. App.3d 884

245 Ill.Dec. 336

Wallace WESTERDALE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ruth Carolyn GROSSMAN, Sarah Grace Tolliver, John Zimmerman, Legal Representative of Estate of Loretta Westerdale, unknown owners and unknown parties, Defendants-Appellees.

Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District.

Rehearing Denied May 18, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. Rehn (argued), Barash & Stoerzbach, Galesburg, for Wallace Westerdale.

John D. McMillan (argued), March & McMillan, Macomb, for Legal Representative of Estate of Loretta Westerdale, Sarah Grace Tolliver, John Zimmerman.

Lawrence Kwacala (argued), Flack McRaven & Stephens, Macomb, for Ruth Carolyn Grossman.


Justice BRESLIN delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff Wallace Westerdale sought to partition his life estate from those interests held by his sisters, defendants Sarah Grace Tolliver and Ruth Carolyn Grossman (collectively, the sisters). The trial court agreed with Ruth's contention that the contingent nature of the remainder interest in Wallace's life estate prevented the partitioning of the land and granted her motion to dismiss. We reverse and hold that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases