1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 268 A.D.2d
  5. 268 A.D.2d 515 (2000)
 

ROBBINS v. EMERY

268 A.D.2d 515 (2000)

701 N.Y.S.2d 664

DAVID ROBBINS et al., Respondents, v. JIMMIE E. EMERY et al., Appellants, and VALERIE M. DIEHL et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided January 24, 2000.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the defendants Valerie Diehl and Daniel Dugan raised triable issues of fact sufficient to defeat the cross motion of Jimmie Eugene Emery and Nicholas Emery (hereinafter the appellants). The appellants waived any objection to the competency of the submissions made in opposition to their cross motion by failing to challenge them before the Supreme...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases