1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 237 Wis.2d
  5. 237 Wis.2d 545 (2000)
 

URMANSKI v. TOWN OF BRADLEY

No. 99-2330.

237 Wis.2d 545 (2000)

2000 WI App 141

613 N.W.2d 905

Melisa URMANSKI, d/b/a Melisa's Mistake, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWN OF BRADLEY, Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided May 23, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Matthew A. Biegert of Doar, Drill & Skow, S.C. of New Richmond, and Randall D.B. Tigue of Randall Tigue Law Office, P.A. of Minneapolis, MN.

On behalf of the defendant-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Harry R. Hertel of Hertel & Gibbs, S.C. of Eau Claire.

Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J.

¶ 1. CANE, C.J.

Melisa Urmanski, d/b/a Melisa's Mistake, appeals from an order upholding the constitutionality of a Town of Bradley ordinance prohibiting nudity on premises operating under a retail Class B liquor license. Urmanski argues that the ordinance is facially overbroad and, thus, violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Because the Town's ordinance is a content-neutral regulation, justified under O'Brien's

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases