1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 612 N.W.2d
  5. 612 N.W.2d 168 (2000)
 

MADSON v. MINNESOTA MIN. AND MFG. CO.

No. CX-99-1508.

612 N.W.2d 168 (2000)

Catherine A. MADSON, petitioner, Appellant, v. MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

June 15, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis Paul Pelowski #245744, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Kathleen M. Mahoney #66588, David M. Wilk #222860, Oppenheimer, Wolff & Donnelly, L.L.P., St. Paul, for respondent.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

GILBERT, Justice.

This appeal arises from a lawsuit filed by appellant Catherine Madson against Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (3M) alleging claims of discrimination and retaliation in violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act. Review of the underlying claims is not before this court. We granted review to decide the narrow question of whether appellant's Minn. R. Civ. P. 60.02(a) and (f) motion to vacate judgment was "proper" under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases