1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 233 Wis.2d
  5. 233 Wis.2d 545 (2000)
 

STATE v. YANG

No. 99-1246-CR.

233 Wis.2d 545 (2000)

2000 WI App 63

608 N.W.2d 703

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Yen YANG, Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided February 8, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and David J. Becker, assistant attorney general.

On behalf of the defendant-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of David J. Matyas, of De Pere.

Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J.

¶ 1. HOOVER, P.J.

The State appeals an order granting a motion to suppress statements and evidence.1 The State contends that the trial court erred by applying the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine to Miranda2 violations that did not also infringe upon Yen Yang's constitutional rights. The issues presented are whether physical evidence derived from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases