CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS v. MELDAHL

No. C6-99-1490.

607 N.W.2d 168 (2000)

CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, et al., Respondents, v. Steven F. MELDAHL, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 14, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jay M. Heffern, Minneapolis City Attorney, Henry T. Reimer, Assistant City Attorney, Minneapolis, for respondents.

Robert K. Shelquist, Bruce L. McLellan, Plunkett, Schwartz, Peterson P.A., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by RANDALL, Presiding Judge, TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge, and HUSPENI, Judge.


OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

On appeal from a dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, appellant Steven Meldahl contends the district court erred because (1) appellant properly brought his inverse condemnation claim in district court and (2) the record was inadequate for certiorari review. Because under the circumstances of this matter, appellant could obtain review of the quasi-judicial decision only through certiorari review by the court of appeals...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases