1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 274 A.D.2d
  5. 274 A.D.2d 500 (2000)
 

HILLDUN CORPORATION v. TEJPAUL

274 A.D.2d 500 (2000)

712 N.Y.S.2d 370

HILLDUN CORPORATION, Appellant, v. VEEKAY TEJPAUL et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided July 24, 2000.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the respondents Veekay Tejpaul and Kavita Lund.

"Although a court should not undertake the construction of an unambiguous agreement, the question of whether ambiguity exists must be determined by reading the agreement as a whole (see, Wing v Wing, 112 A.D.2d 932; A & Z Appliances v Electric Burglar Alarm Co., 90 A.D.2d 802...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases