Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant contends that the plaintiffs' notice of claim failed to comply with General Municipal Law § 50-e (2) because it did not give a sufficient description of the location of the defect in question. We disagree. The requirement of General Municipal Law § 50-e (2) that a notice of claim set forth "the place where * * * the claim arose" is met when the notice describes the location with sufficient particularity...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
