1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 24 S.W.3d
  5. 24 S.W.3d 738 (2000)
 

SARKIS v. HEIMBURGER

No. ED 75523.

24 S.W.3d 738 (2000)

Anthony SARKIS, et al., Appellants, v. Roy R. HEIMBURGER, et al., Respondents.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

February 1, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey J. Lowe, St. Louis, for appellants.

Richard A. Ahrens, St. Louis, for respondents.

Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Sarkis, et al., ("Plaintiffs") appeal from the trial court's dismissal of their petition against Roy Heimburger, et al., ("Defendants") for lack of standing.

We find that no error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases