A & S TRUCKING SERVICE, INC. v. NEW YORK STATE THRUWAY AUTHORITY


268 A.D.2d 493 (2000)

702 N.Y.S.2d 347

A & S TRUCKING SERVICE, INC., et al., Claimants, v. NEW YORK STATE THRUWAY AUTHORITY, Defendant. (Claim No. 1.) (Claim No. 75782.) FREDERICK SCHAEFER, Claimant, v. NEW YORK STATE THRUWAY AUTHORITY, Defendant and Third-Party Claimant-Respondent. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. (Claim No. 6.) (Claim No. 78345.) (And Four Other Titles.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided January 24, 2000.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The determination of a trial court after a nonjury trial should not be disturbed on appeal unless it is not supported by legally sufficient evidence or could not have been reached by any fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Greenberg v Behlen, 220 A.D.2d 720). The evidence here is legally sufficient to support the determination that the appellant was equitably estopped...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases