1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 226 F.3d
  5. 226 F.3d 535 (2000)
 

CONTEMPO DESIGN v. CHICAGO & N.E. IL CARPENTERS

No. 98-3206.

226 F.3d 535 (2000)

CONTEMPO DESIGN, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHICAGO AND NORTHEAST ILLINOIS DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Reargued December 14, 1999.

Decided August 15, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karl W. Grabemann, Ogletree, Deakins, Murphy, Smith & Polk, Peter A. Steinmeyer (argued), Epstein, Becker & Green, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Travis J. Ketterman (argued), Whitfield & Gregoria, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before FLAUM, Chief Judge, and POSNER, COFFEY, EASTERBROOK, RIPPLE, MANION, KANNE, ROVNER, DIANE P. WOOD, EVANS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Reargued En Banc December 14, 1999.

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.

Contempo Design, Inc. ("Contempo") filed an action under § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act ("LMRA"), 29 U.S.C. § 185, against the Chicago and Northeast Illinois District Council of Carpenters ("the Union") for striking in violation of their collective bargaining agreement. The Union, believing it was not bound by the collective bargaining agreement, had instituted a strike against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases