CURLEY v. SZUMOWSKI


269 A.D.2d 486 (2000)

703 N.Y.S.2d 732

THOMAS CURLEY, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of THOMAS CURLEY, JR., et al., Respondents, v. BOZENA SZUMOWSKI et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided February 22, 2000.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs (see, Leonard v Kinney Sys., 199 A.D.2d 470; Lipsius v White, 91 A.D.2d 271, 276), the emergency doctrine does not entitle the defendants to summary judgment as a matter of law. The record presents issues of fact concerning the participation of the defendant Gregory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases