1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 90 F.Supp.2d
  5. 90 F.Supp.2d 662 (2000)
 

ARONSON v. SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P.

No. Civ.A. 99-1796.

90 F.Supp.2d 662 (2000)

Mark B. ARONSON, and Joseph G. Kanfoush, Plaintiffs, v. SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P., and Sprint Communications Company, L.P., each individually and each doing business as Sprint Personal Communications Services, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

January 12, 2000.

OPINION

ZIEGLER, Chief Judge.

Pending before the court is the motion (doc. no. 2) of defendants, Sprint Spectrum, L.P., Sprint Communications Company, L.P., and Sprint Personal Communications Services (collectively "Sprint"), to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and the motion (doc. no. 5) of plaintiffs, Mark B. Aronson and Joseph G. Kanfoush, to remand pursuant to 28...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases