Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the prosecutor improperly commented on his pretrial silence in violation of his rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution during summation. However, the prosecutor's remark constituted a fair comment on the defendant's trial testimony regarding his actions after the crime and did not improperly refer to his prearrest silence (see, People v Conyers,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.